Gazas
Evil still prevails in some locales of this world.
With only a day to go, it's pretty obvious by now that Obama is a shoe-in. The next 4 years will be heralded as a change in an orgasmic fury of bliss. And I use the mixed metaphors deliberately; a change is gonna come, no doubt. But it won't be the party the rank-and-file are expecting. Of course, this society of ours continues to be dominated by obtuse fools who refuse to acknowledge that the change has come, and has been here for awhile. Obama, Clinton, Palin.... They all represent that America is the land of equal opportunity-. But we remain mulish camps of monolithic people.
I will not vote for him. I once was his biggest fan, even campaigning for him in the classroom. But not now. He has naively made too many contradictory promises, he threw himself a Vanity Project major network celebration last week, with money garnered from a broken campaign pledge. He has decided to talk tough, even thuggish, on Pakistan, even threatening the war he so strenuously disavows. He panders to the Israel lobby and pro-lifers and gun-toters, even though his record on these subjects suggests far otherwise. He is elitist - a small-town boy made good, he now hobnobs with the urban intelligentsia. He looks down his nose at small town residents.
I will not vote for McCain. I wish that the SNL version I saw of him a couple of days ago was just normal, everyday McCain - but it's not. A man with a steady flow of that kind of charisma, eloquence and self-deferential wit needs to be in the White House. But there are no comers, are there? Maybe Ron Paul is, but he dropped out because - and Obamamaniacs, take note - he wanted to put his money to better use. McCain more and more seems like a grumpy old man, sniping at a candidate who's about to give him a whuppin'. And who probably followed some bad advice on the way to that whuppin'.
(Heh. Can't you imagine the conversation 'twixt Palin and McCain? "Sarah, really, just drop out. Please. We goofed." "Uh-uh, no way John. I'm going places.""But Sarah, you can't see Russia from Pennsylvania Avenue." "Nope, and I can't see that many stars as I would in Alaska, either. But I will see one in Washington; My own. Rapidly ascending." "Will you at least make fun of yourself on SNL?" "Nope. Ain't gonnadoit.. wouldn't be prudent.")
The truth of the matter is, it's the bulk of Obama's frenzied fans that turn my stomach sour, not so much the man himself. Obama just doesn't seem ready yet - but Obamamania? When I started on this blog, the insults and outrageous assumptions about me came flying! Now I'm just ignored - as this piece may surely be as well. Obamamaniacs ignore the gaffs their man makes, as well. They share the Bush mentality: if you're not with us, you're against us. Here is a short list of words I've read and heard to describe people who questioned Obama and his campaign: "racist," "bigoted," "lacking in mental acuity," Republican," "conservative," "backwood," "blind," "Bush fans," "fearmongers," "traitorous," "of a certain ilk," "doltish." Never any credit for a person simply thinking independently.
Have people on the other side been just as bad? "You betcha," he said with a wink. But I thought this was the Season of Change. To tell you the truth, all I see is a mentality of "It's Payback Time!" And to go further into the truth, I've been facing and fighting against that sort of inane mindset all of my life. I've often been ridiculed and ostracized because I elect to go my own way, and can just as easily criticize the teams on both ends of the field. This is why I have taken such exception when so many smug doofi got together to beat up on McCain and Palin not on the issues - but on insubstantial trivia, making full use of the words I listed above and many others.
And whereas McCain has quieted the few bigots in his assembly crowds, Obama has never done the same to his supporters. He believes the lies and taunts they come up with. Lord knows McCain should have done the same to his campaign management, that Palin should have done the same herself.
But I've been in McCain's position, ostracized and shouted down by bullies. So yeah, he's had my sympathy. I still think he's a decent man - despite every show and magazine in the country talking potshots at him. I still think Obama's a decent person. But neither one deserves the White House now.
So whom do I vote for? I must admit I know precious little of Chuck Baldwin. I know Ron Paul says to support him, but I would have had to have known this guy for at least a year before I'd consider anything so drastic. But after much consideration, I decided to vote for him anyway. Why? I know he can't win. My vote will say there's more than one choice between two candidates - that I don't have to settle for the same old distortion the media and the public forcefeed me every 4 years. There are options, other viable candidates. And what Paul and presumably Baldwin have to say makes more sense than the clueless rhetoric coming from the Obama and McCain camps.
Hey, Obama is for universal healthcare. I fully support this. McCain wants to walk softly and carry a big stick. I'm for that, too. But after waiting a year for either one of these guys to deliver the knockout punch and fully sway me, I know now it ain't coming.
So to all you self-congratulatory, liberal elite out there, enjoy the party. And get ready for what's to come. Obama's going to be breaking far more promises soon, and there's many tough choices that will have to be made. I pray that we in this country can finally unite and emerge victorious. But we love to pick sides - and the way things have been going in this country, I have my doubts.
With only a day to go, it's pretty obvious by now that Obama is a shoe-in. The next 4 years will be heralded as a change in an orgasmic fury of bliss. And I use the mixed metaphors deliberately; a change is gonna come, no doubt. But it won't be the party the rank-and-file are expecting. Of course, this society of ours continues to be dominated by obtuse fools who refuse to acknowledge that the change has come, and has been here for awhile. Obama, Clinton, Palin.... They all represent that America is the land of equal opportunity--. But we remain a monolithic people.
I will not vote for him. I once was his biggest fan, even campaigning for him in the classroom. But not now. He has naively made too many contradictory promises, he threw himself a Vanity Project major network celebration last week, with money garnered from a broken campaign pledge. He has decided to talk tough, even thuggish, on Pakistan, even threatening the war he so strenuously disavows. He panders to the Israel lobby and pro-lifers and gun-toters, even though his record on these subjects suggests far otherwise. He is elitist - a small-town boy made good, he now hobnobs with the urban intelligentsia. He looks down his nose at small town residents.
I will not vote for McCain. I wish that the SNL version I saw of him a couple of days ago was just normal, everyday McCain - but it's not. A man with a steady flow of that kind of charisma, eloquence and self-deferential wit needs to be in the White House. But there are no comers, are there? Maybe Ron Paul is, but he dropped out because - and Obamamaniacs, take note - he wanted to put his money to better use. McCain more and more seems like a grumpy old man, sniping at a candidate who's about to give him a whuppin'. And who probably followed some bad advice on the way to that whuppin'.
(Heh. Can't you imagine the conversation 'twixt Palin and McCain? "Sarah, really, just drop out. Please. We goofed." "Uh-uh, no way John. I'm going places.""But Sarah, you can't see Russia from Pennsylvania Avenue." "Nope, and I can't see that many stars as I would in Alaska, either. But I will see one in Washington; My own. Rapidly ascending." "Will you at least make fun of yourself on SNL?" "Nope. Ain't gonnadoit.. wouldn't be prudent.")
The truth of the matter is, it's the bulk of Obama's frenzied fans that turn my stomach sour, not so much the man himself. Obama just doesn't seem ready yet - but Obamamania? When I started on this blog, the insults and outrageous assumptions about me came flying! Now I'm just ignored - as this piece may surely be as well. Obama maniacs share the Bush mentality: if you're not with us, you're against us. Here is a short list of words I've read and heard to describe people who questioned Obama and his campaign: "racist," "bigoted," "lacking in mental acuity," Republican," "conservative," "backwood," "blind," "Bush fans," "fearmongers," "traitorous," "of a certain ilk," "doltish." Never any credit for a person simply thinking indecently.
Have people on the other side been just as bad? "You betcha," he said with a wink. But I thought this was the Season of Change. To tell you the truth, all I see is a mentality of "It's Payback Time!" And to go further into the truth, I've been facing and fighting against that sort of inane mindset all of my life. I've often been ridiculed and ostracized because I elect to go my own way, and can just as easily criticize the teams on both ends of the field. This is why I have taken such exception when so many smug doofi got together to beat up on McCain and Palin not on the issues - but on insubstantial trivia, making full use of the words I listed above and many others.
And whereas McCain has quieted the few bigots in his assembly crowds, Obama has never done the same to his supporters. He believes the lies and taunts they come up with. Lord knows McCain should have done the same to his campaign management, that Palin should have done the same herself.
But I've been in McCain's position, ostracized and shouted down by bullies. So yeah, he's had my sympathy. I still think he's a decent man - despite every show and magazine in the country talking potshots at him. I still think Obama's a decent person. But neither one deserves the White House now.
So whom do I vote for? I must admit I k now precious little of Chuck Baldwin. I know Ron Paul says to support him, but I would have had to have known this guy for at least a year before I'd consider anything so drastic. But after much consideration, I decided to vote for him anyway. Why? I know he can't win. My vote will say there's more than one choice between two candidates - that I don't have to settle for the same old distortion the media and the public forcefeed me every 4 years. There are options, other viable candidates. And what Paul and presumably Baldwin have to say makes more sense than the clueless rhetoric coming from the Obama and McCain camps.
Hey, Obama is for universal healthcare. I fully support this. McCain wants to walk softly and carry a big stick. I'm for that, too. But after waiting a year for either one of these guys to deliver the knockout punch and fully sway me, I know now it ain't coming.
So to all you self-congratulatory, liberal elite out there, enjoy the party. And get ready for what's to come. Obama's going to be breaking far more promises soon, and there's many tough choices that will have to be made. I pray that we in this country can finally unite and emerge victorious. But we love to pick sides - and the way things have been going in this country, I have my doubts.
With only a day to go, it's pretty obvious by now that Obama is a shoe-in. The next 4 years will be heralded as a change in an orgasmic fury of bliss. And I use the mixed metaphors deliberately; a change is gonna come, no doubt. But it won't be the party the rank-and-file are expecting. Of course, this society of ours continues to be dominated by obtuse fools who refuse to acknowledge that the change has come, and has been here for awhile. Obama, Clinton, Palin.... They all represent that America is the land of equal opportunity--. But we remain a monolithic people.
I will not vote for him. I once was his biggest fan, even campaigning for him in the classroom. But not now. He has naively made too many contradictory promises, he threw himself a Vanity Project major network celebration last week, with money garnered from a broken campaign pledge. He has decided to talk tough, even thuggish, on Pakistan, even threatening the war he so strenuously disavows. He panders to the Israel lobby and pro-lifers and gun-toters, even though his record on these subjects suggests far otherwise. He is elitist - a small-town boy made good, he now hobnobs with the urban intelligentsia. He looks down his nose at small town residents.
I will not vote for McCain. I wish that the SNL version I saw of him a couple of days ago was just normal, everyday McCain - but it's not. A man with a steady flow of that kind of charisma, eloquence and self-deferential wit needs to be in the White House. But there are no comers, are there? Maybe Ron Paul is, but he dropped out because - and Obamamaniacs, take note - he wanted to put his money to better use. McCain more and more seems like a grumpy old man, sniping at a candidate who's about to give him a whuppin'. And who probably followed some bad advice on the way to that whuppin'.
(Heh. Can't you imagine the conversation 'twixt Palin and McCain? "Sarah, really, just drop out. Please. We goofed." "Uh-uh, no way John. I'm going places.""But Sarah, you can't see Russia from Pennsylvania Avenue." "Nope, and I can't see that many stars as I would in Alaska, either. But I will see one in Washington; My own. Rapidly ascending." "Will you at least make fun of yourself on SNL?" "Nope. Ain't gonnadoit.. wouldn't be prudent.")
The truth of the matter is, it's the bulk of Obama's frenzied fans that turn my stomach sour, not so much the man himself. Obama just doesn't seem ready yet - but Obamamania? When I started on this blog, the insults and outrageous assumptions about me came flying! Now I'm just ignored - as this piece may surely be as well. Obama maniacs share the Bush mentality: if you're not with us, you're against us. Here is a short list of words I've read and heard to describe people who questioned Obama and his campaign: "racist," "bigoted," "lacking in mental acuity," Republican," "conservative," "backwood," "blind," "Bush fans," "fearmongers," "traitorous," "of a certain ilk," "doltish." Never any credit for a person simply thinking indecently.
Have people on the other side been just as bad? "You betcha," he said with a wink. But I thought this was the Season of Change. To tell you the truth, all I see is a mentality of "It's Payback Time!" And to go further into the truth, I've been facing and fighting against that sort of inane mindset all of my life. I've often been ridiculed and ostracized because I elect to go my own way, and can just as easily criticize the teams on both ends of the field. This is why I have taken such exception when so many smug doofi got together to beat up on McCain and Palin not on the issues - but on insubstantial trivia, making full use of the words I listed above and many others.
And whereas McCain has quieted the few bigots in his assembly crowds, Obama has never done the same to his supporters. He believes the lies and taunts they come up with. Lord knows McCain should have done the same to his campaign management, that Palin should have done the same herself.
But I've been in McCain's position, ostracized and shouted down by bullies. So yeah, he's had my sympathy. I still think he's a decent man - despite every show and magazine in the country talking potshots at him. I still think Obama's a decent person. But neither one deserves the White House now.
So whom do I vote for? I must admit I k now precious little of Chuck Baldwin. I know Ron Paul says to support him, but I would have had to have known this guy for at least a year before I'd consider anything so drastic. But after much consideration, I decided to vote for him anyway. Why? I know he can't win. My vote will say there's more than one choice between two candidates - that I don't have to settle for the same old distortion the media and the public forcefeed me every 4 years. There are options, other viable candidates. And what Paul and presumably Baldwin have to say makes more sense than the clueless rhetoric coming from the Obama and McCain camps.
Hey, Obama is for universal healthcare. I fully support this. McCain wants to walk softly and carry a big stick. I'm for that, too. But after waiting a year for either one of these guys to deliver the knockout punch and fully sway me, I know now it ain't coming.
So to all you self-congratulatory, liberal elite out there, enjoy the party. And get ready for what's to come. Obama's going to be breaking far more promises soon, and there's many tough choices that will have to be made. I pray that we in this country can finally unite and emerge victorious. But we love to pick sides - and the way things have been going in this country, I have my doubts.
With only a day to go, it's pretty obvious by now that Obama is a shoe-in. The next 4 years will be heralded as a change in an orgasmic fury of bliss. And I use the mixed metaphors deliberately; a change is gonna come, no doubt. But it won't be the party the rank-and-file are expecting. Of course, this society of ours continues to be dominated by obtuse fools who refuse to acknowledge that the change has come, and has been here for awhile. Obama, Clinton, Palin.... They all represent that America is the land of equal opportunity--. But we remain a monolithic people.
I will not vote for him. I once was his biggest fan, even campaigning for him in the classroom. But not now. He has naively made too many contradictory promises, he threw himself a Vanity Project major network celebration last week, with money garnered from a broken campaign pledge. He has decided to talk tough, even thuggish, on Pakistan, even threatening the war he so strenuously disavows. He panders to the Israel lobby and pro-lifers and gun-toters, even though his record on these subjects suggests far otherwise. He is elitist - a small-town boy made good, he now hobnobs with the urban intelligentsia. He looks down his nose at small town residents.
I will not vote for McCain. I wish that the SNL version I saw of him a couple of days ago was just normal, everyday McCain - but it's not. A man with a steady flow of that kind of charisma, eloquence and self-deferential wit needs to be in the White House. But there are no comers, are there? Maybe Ron Paul is, but he dropped out because - and Obamamaniacs, take note - he wanted to put his money to better use. McCain more and more seems like a grumpy old man, sniping at a candidate who's about to give him a whuppin'. And who probably followed some bad advice on the way to that whuppin'.
(Heh. Can't you imagine the conversation 'twixt Palin and McCain? "Sarah, really, just drop out. Please. We goofed." "Uh-uh, no way John. I'm going places.""But Sarah, you can't see Russia from Pennsylvania Avenue." "Nope, and I can't see that many stars as I would in Alaska, either. But I will see one in Washington; My own. Rapidly ascending." "Will you at least make fun of yourself on SNL?" "Nope. Ain't gonnadoit.. wouldn't be prudent.")
The truth of the matter is, it's the bulk of Obama's frenzied fans that turn my stomach sour, not so much the man himself. Obama just doesn't seem ready yet - but Obamamania? When I started on this blog, the insults and outrageous assumptions about me came flying! Now I'm just ignored - as this piece may surely be as well. Obama maniacs share the Bush mentality: if you're not with us, you're against us. Here is a short list of words I've read and heard to describe people who questioned Obama and his campaign: "racist," "bigoted," "lacking in mental acuity," Republican," "conservative," "backwood," "blind," "Bush fans," "fearmongers," "traitorous," "of a certain ilk," "doltish." Never any credit for a person simply thinking indecently.
Have people on the other side been just as bad? "You betcha," he said with a wink. But I thought this was the Season of Change. To tell you the truth, all I see is a mentality of "It's Payback Time!" And to go further into the truth, I've been facing and fighting against that sort of inane mindset all of my life. I've often been ridiculed and ostracized because I elect to go my own way, and can just as easily criticize the teams on both ends of the field. This is why I have taken such exception when so many smug doofi got together to beat up on McCain and Palin not on the issues - but on insubstantial trivia, making full use of the words I listed above and many others.
And whereas McCain has quieted the few bigots in his assembly crowds, Obama has never done the same to his supporters. He believes the lies and taunts they come up with. Lord knows McCain should have done the same to his campaign management, that Palin should have done the same herself.
But I've been in McCain's position, ostracized and shouted down by bullies. So yeah, he's had my sympathy. I still think he's a decent man - despite every show and magazine in the country talking potshots at him. I still think Obama's a decent person. But neither one deserves the White House now.
So whom do I vote for? I must admit I k now precious little of Chuck Baldwin. I know Ron Paul says to support him, but I would have had to have known this guy for at least a year before I'd consider anything so drastic. But after much consideration, I decided to vote for him anyway. Why? I know he can't win. My vote will say there's more than one choice between two candidates - that I don't have to settle for the same old distortion the media and the public forcefeed me every 4 years. There are options, other viable candidates. And what Paul and presumably Baldwin have to say makes more sense than the clueless rhetoric coming from the Obama and McCain camps.
Hey, Obama is for universal healthcare. I fully support this. McCain wants to walk softly and carry a big stick. I'm for that, too. But after waiting a year for either one of these guys to deliver the knockout punch and fully sway me, I know now it ain't coming.
So to all you self-congratulatory, liberal elite out there, enjoy the party. And get ready for what's to come. Obama's going to be breaking far more promises soon, and there's many tough choices that will have to be made. I pray that we in this country can finally unite and emerge victorious. But we love to pick sides - and the way things have been going in this country, I have my doubts.
I'll go out on a limb here.
The economic zeitgeist is probably impenetrable, but I'll give it a shot.
America is the only country I know of where its citizens run up monstrous
private debts and triple mortgages, then complain about the state the economy
is in. WE must take fiscal responsibility for ourselves. And the government, I
think, needs to impose caps on prices and spending. We have allowed our runaway
tank to drastically affect the world, and we must put an end to this. Obama's
loan relief is a great idea, but we must realize this treats symptomology. The
cause is out-of-control prices. Our paper currency is practically valueless.
And we must take control of this train wreck.
So: back to the gold standard. Have our currency actually backed by something
substantial, so that there are finite limits imposed on inflation and
deflation. Find the instances everywhere costs are out of control, and stage a
series of regulatory Congressional sessions that will culminate in the
reining-in of spending practices across the board.
I don't mean across the board cuts, as McCain proposes. I mean across the board
regulations. I believe government is responsible to the people and must
guide us - but not by spending more. By enacting fair controls.
A recent conversation with a colleague (a claims adjuster) underscores my
point. I told him the real problem with health care costs is the preposterous
salaries of health care providers. He agreed to a point - but added that
providers have to deal with the rising cost of malpractice insurance - which
indicts the insurance industry and as always, lawyers. Further, he cited the
costs of machinery and technology and real estate.... More indictments. They in
turn are sure to blame their own bogeymen.
Another example: when I lived in Alaska (ah, it makes sense now, eh?) I was
struck by exorbitantly high everything was. Even paper and lumber and products
made from same. But why? Well, the mill owners had to be able to afford the new
cars that were being shipped in from Seattle, and the car dealers wanted to
afford the vacations out to Ketchikan to see if they really should lobby for
the Bridge to Nowhere, and the Ketchikan fisherman wanted to be able to afford
the newest video game designed in part by Alaskan geeks but with parts
manufactured in San Francisco.... and so on.
Prices rise in this country because we want them to. I know that sounds
simplistic, but truly, this is the reason. At least that's why they start to
rise - then, when they spiral out of control, we disavow any responsibility and
cry out to the Heavens - or Washington - for monetary relief, in the form of
more spending programs.
We should even consider monetary deflation. Take a zero or two from the value of our bills. (Hey, it continues to work for Poland.)
I want to remind everyone that FDR provided relief by putting people to work,
creating jobs, and not just handing out wads of cash. We must not only create
jobs for people, and encourage the creation of jobs (jobs here on American
land, and not overseas), we must create a mindset of national fiscal responsibility.
To cite FDR again, he rose to the challenge of the times by leading his country
into doing something bold, something heroic.
The time for boldness has come again.
America is a great country. This upcoming election will not
be as historic as the race for the same has been. A black man and a white woman
generating unprecedented excitement by running for president. A white man
signing on as sidekick to a black man on the presidential ticket, a white woman
on the other side of the aisle, also on board as sidekick - and so there's no
misunderstanding of my words - both
competing for Most Important Sidekick in America. All this has been, and
continues to be, absolutely soul-stirring... life-affirming. In plain words,
race and gender have ceased to be detriments. As a nation, we've gotten
over racism and sexism.
America is also, in pockets. a deeply prejudicial country. This is not the same
as racism; it seems I will never have to stop stating this. A prejudiced person
will have his doubts, but will give a fella the benefit of that doubt. A racist
person will not. There is a huge difference, and those who ignore or
deliberately misrepresent that difference, do this great nation a disservice.
This is why so many independents and even Republicans - like the
"recovering republicans" who have posted here recently, as well as a
dear friend of mine - are willing to vote for Barack Obama.
This cannot be overstated: we as a people have progressed to this idealistic stance
toward race and gender because, despite our ingrained prejudices, we give the
benefit of the doubt to people we may initially view with hesitation. And that
leads to absolute Democracy. That leads to the end of the prejudices. People
like Obama and Palin lead us to Democracy. While people who scream racist at every turn... lead us into
caves.
Are these horrific racists still abiding in this country? Absolutely! Ignore them,
vilify them, marginalize them. But they are the minority.
And those who bring up the sector of race-baiting as the great bogeyman are
nothing less then hate-mongering, bullying fools. When the media runs headlines
on the subject of race day after day, when they speak of some mysteriously
mercurial "Bradley Effect," when posters on this very page
develop a post-November 4th Democratic loss strategy by blaming it on racism
and characterizing all Republicans and Alaskans and mid-Westerners and rural
Americans and anyone not zealously pro-Obama as backwards bigots, then politics
as usual continues.
When Governor Palin ramps up the rhetoric and character attacks on Senator
Obama, and doesn't quiet the mean-spirited people at her rallies, she allows
these stupid, foolish people too much face (or voice) time and she is doing
this nation a disservice. But even though she is associated with McCain, she is
not McCain. McCain has consistently told his more radical constituents where
there are wrong.
In this race, we've all heard characterizations of "we" and
"they", "us" and "them". We've heard the other
side denounced as wrong and wrong-headed. We've had the blogger, the politician
with 7 houses, overpaid doctors and union reps, and the actor who makes 15
million dollars a picture all try to stake a claim to solidarity with the
working man, trying to influence our vote. We've heard pundits and entertainers
state that we need to "redefine America."
This is getting foolish, dangerous, ridiculous. America, which embraces Hillary
Clinton and Barack Obama and Sarah Palin... Joe Biden, John McCain, etc. - does
not need to be redefined. It needs to be refined, reinvigorated, rededicated to
the ideals of Democracy and fair play that were implicit in the framing of our
Constitution, but got glossed over and rationalized and even trashed over the
years.... but step by painful step, America has ultimately got around to
embracing and celebrating these ideals.
And we continue to do it. God bless America. In this election, for both the
parties and their myriad supporters, there must be dignity in defeat. And
perhaps more important, there must be dignity in victory. No gloating should be
allowed here - rather, let us celebrate the camaraderie and solidarity forged
in a job well done and a race well fought.
And in an America that stands tall. Very, very tall.