-
"...how is this guy still in office?"
Why do you ask? His testimony ably demonstrates the obfuscational skills prized second only to loyalty by BushCo.
One gets the impression these jerkwads sit around with drinks after a such a day as today congratulating the one who testified. It wouldn't surprise me to hear they consider it all a game with a point system based on the brazen mendacity/non-sequitorality of each response.
Posted at June 22, 2007 7:26 AM in response to TPMtv Transcript: Thursday, June 21, 2007
-
Oh my goodness gracious!
Is he an arrogant prick? Yes. Is he mortified by the perception that he was fired? Of course! Does he need all this aggravation? No. Does it rankle this modern Gulliver that so many Lilliputians regard him as the primary architect of our country's most unmitigated military failure? Obviously. Would he like to salvage his place in history? 10-4, good buddy! Isn't that a long shot at this point? Affirmative. Will he spend the rest of his life attempting to shirk responsibility for his innumerable, catastrophically wrong decisions as SecDef? Roger that! Is that proof of moral cowardice? Indubitably.
"If knowledge hangs around your neck like pearls instead of chains, you are a lucky man!"
Posted at December 13, 2006 8:21 AM in response to Rummy's Long Knives
-
Any truth to the claim Zarqawi was killed with 3 #2 men?
Posted at June 8, 2006 11:26 AM in response to Some Excellent News
-
"I can think of nothing that would do more to damage the global nonproliferation effort than the spread of the belief that the main reason nonproliferation is pursued by powerful countries is so that they can maintain the freedom to intervene in the domestic affairs of weaker countries. I hope we don't hear a lot of talk of this kind from well-placed strategic thinkers and well-known pundits, because the talk itself is highly dangerous, and only increases global suspicion."
Aahhh! The elephant in the room. The truth that dare not speak its name. "Highly dangerous" because it so obviously is a major factor in the forward-leaning strategies of ambitious, nukular-bearing powers.
Posted at February 23, 2006 11:48 AM in response to What's the Context for Non-Proliferation?
-
Policy Alteration Expiditor
Information Laison (with Extreme Prejudice)
Posted at January 24, 2006 3:35 PM in response to Department of Semantics
